A practical agenda for helping a team talk about preferences, friction, feedback, and decision norms without turning the session into a diagnosis exercise.
The durable artifact is not the type label. It is the team’s written norms for decisions, feedback, disagreement, meetings, and async work.
Say out loud: this is a possible preference, not a psychological evaluation. People can edit or reject their result.
Each person updates their profile card so the discussion uses their language instead of a generic archetype.
Look for overrepresented types, missing perspectives, same-type pairs, and tension zones.
Pick one same-type or complement prompt and one tension or blind-spot prompt. Keep the conversation concrete.
Capture team rules for decisions, feedback, disagreement, meeting defaults, and what perspectives to invite.
Bad workshop: “John is an 8, so he steamrolls.” Good workshop: “John prefers directness. Maya prefers steadiness. What rule would help them disagree without either person disappearing or dominating?”
The paid value is the ready-to-run map, prompts, profile cards, deck, and working agreement. The quiz is the acquisition hook.
Quiz link, editable cards, full map, 30/60-minute guides, presentable deck, and export path.